Microeconomics

Historically, price discrimination was considered illegal in all insta

Historically, price discrimination was considered illegal in all instances. More recently, antitrust authorities have discovered that A) price discrimination can increase the coverage of a market thereby increasing welfare. B) price discrimination limits the coverage of a market thereby increasing welfare. C) price discrimination limits the coverage of a market thereby decreasing welfare. D) price […]

Read full post

Date: September 9th, 2020

“Supporters of import restrictions and protectionist policies place gr

“Supporters of import restrictions and protectionist policies place greater weight on producer welfare than on consumer welfare.” Comment. What will be an ideal response?   ANSWER Import restrictions increase the producer surplus of domestic producers. Consumer surplus, however, decreases by more than producers gain. Thus, the statement seems to be correct.  

Read full post

Date: September 9th, 2020

The welfare loss from an import quota is greater than that of an equiv

The welfare loss from an import quota is greater than that of an equivalent tariff because A) tariff revenues can be used to society’s benefit. B) the loss in consumer surplus is not as large. C) domestic producers gain more from a quota than from a tariff. D) tariff revenues represent an additional deadweight loss. […]

Read full post

Date: September 9th, 2020