Macroeconomics

In the case of Matsushita v. Zenith, the fact that the foreign televis

In the case of Matsushita v. Zenith, the fact that the foreign television manufacturers were able to charge lower prices than their domestic competitors in the U.S. market for televisions was sufficient evidence to conclude that the Japanese firms were engaged in predatory pricing. Indicate whether the statement is true or false   ANSWER FALSE

Read full post

Date: September 10th, 2020

Which of the following statements is correct? A) A change in demand o

Which of the following statements is correct? A) A change in demand or supply can only be caused by a change in price. B) A simultaneous decrease in demand and increase in supply will result in an increase in equilibrium price and uncertain effect on quantity. C) If price is currently above equilibrium, market adjustments […]

Read full post

Date: September 10th, 2020

A predatory pricing strategy will have the greatest chance of success

A predatory pricing strategy will have the greatest chance of success when the predatory price is set below the cost of the firm’s competitors, new rivals are unlikely to enter after the strategy ends, and profits can be recouped in a relatively short period of time. Indicate whether the statement is true or false   […]

Read full post

Date: September 10th, 2020

Assume a firm has decided to undertake a limit pricing strategy. For t

Assume a firm has decided to undertake a limit pricing strategy. For the strategy to be successful, the firm does not need to actually possess a cost advantage over potential entrants. Rather, the firm simply has to be able to convince potential entrants that it does, in fact, possess an advantage. Indicate whether the statement […]

Read full post

Date: September 10th, 2020