Macroeconomics

In the case of Matsushita v. Zenith, the fact that the foreign televis

In the case of Matsushita v. Zenith, the fact that the foreign television manufacturers were able to charge lower prices than their domestic competitors in the U.S. market for televisions was sufficient evidence to conclude that the Japanese firms were engaged in predatory pricing. Indicate whether the statement is true or false   ANSWER FALSE

Read full post

Date: September 10th, 2020