QUESTION
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument for Fizz to introduce an energy drink?
A) Studies indicate that consumers largely associate the company’s products with a healthy lifestyle.
B) The energy drink market is highly concentrated, and there are only two major global players.
C) The company has an extensive distribution network that can ensure a nationwide rollout of the new product.
D) Major sources of new-product ideas for Fizz include internal sources such as managers and employees.
E) Customers of energy drinks are not known to be highly brand loyal.
ANSWER
Answer: A
Explanation: A) It makes sense for Fizz to enter the energy drink market if it has a reasonable expectation of successfully competing in that market. If the company is already associated with a healthy lifestyle, as stated in Choice A, then its energy drink is likely to have a natural appeal for the energy drink market—people who are interested in a healthy lifestyle. Choice B suggests that the global energy drink market is already dominated by two powerful players. However, Fizz is interested in marketing an energy drink in the United States. Choice C assumes that a nationwide rollout is the best strategy for a new energy drink. That may or may not be the case. Choice D tells us nothing about the question of whether Fizz should introduce an energy drink. Choice E could either strengthen or weaken the argument: consumers of energy drinks won’t be tied by loyalty to current brands, but they are also unlikely to develop loyalty for Fizz’s energy drinks.
Place an order in 3 easy steps. Takes less than 5 mins.